mantispy.pp.feature_batch_sensitivity#
- mantispy.pp.feature_batch_sensitivity(adata, batch_key='Metadata_Batch', threshold=0.05, key_added='batch', copy=False)#
Test each feature for dependence on the batch, after whatever correction was applied.
- Parameters:
adata (
AnnData) – Profiles to test.batch_key (
str(default:'Metadata_Batch')) –obscolumn holding the batch, imaging week or plate.threshold (
float(default:0.05)) – q-value below which a feature is called batch sensitive.key_added (
str(default:'batch')) – Prefix forvar[key_added + "_pvalue"],_qvalueand_sensitive.copy (
bool(default:False)) – Return a modified copy instead of mutating in place.
- Return type:
- Returns:
None, or the modified copy. Writesvar[key_added + "_pvalue"],var[key_added + "_qvalue"]and the booleanvar[key_added + "_sensitive"].- Raises:
ValueError – If
batch_keyholds fewer than two batches.
Notes
Uses Kruskal-Wallis instead of ANOVA, because morphology features are not normally distributed and a few extreme wells should not decide the result. Expect a large fraction to come back sensitive, since per-plate centering does not remove plate structure: over BBBC021’s treated wells, 338 of 344 features still depend on the plate at q < 0.05 after per-plate normalization, and rohban2017 and pki are similar.
Compare the sensitive fraction before and after a correction.